Autocracy + Ochlocracy = Democracy

Properties of autocracies and republics
Optimal social system
Systemic properties of democracy
The communal nature of people
Utopian doctrine of individualism
Systemic properties of ochlocracy
Chimera of autocracy and ochlocracy

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation
with an average voter © Winston Churchill

Properties of autocracies and republics

In Western countries, the historical process was accompanied by the transformation of autocracies into republics.
In an autocracy, power is exercised by a hierarchical state system, which is headed by the Supreme Ruler – the pharaoh, monarch, dictator.
The ruler governs by arbitrary orders.
Established laws prohibit residents from certain actions and other actions not permitted by special rules.
The state co-opts new members into its apparatus on the principle of inheritance and for special merits.
The state takes away part of the property of the inhabitants in the form of taxes and duties.
The state forcibly compels the inhabitants to perform duties, first of all, to serve in the army.
The state appoints judges.

In a republic, power is exercised by many independent people.
Therefore, in order to exercise power, these people are forced to agree and collectively establish laws.
These laws regulate the procedures for the functioning of public authorities from national to local, the adoption of laws, the functioning of executive authorities from national to local.
Members of public authorities are delegated and recalled by communities of residents.
Public authorities appoint the heads of their executive authorities.

Public laws prohibit all residents from performing certain actions.
Public laws prohibit authorities from prohibiting all other actions that are not explicitly prohibited by laws.
Public laws prohibit authorities from forcing residents to perform duties and taking away their property.

Judges are elected and dismissed by associations of lawyers.
The function of the courts is to detect the falsity of the arguments of the parties to the dispute.
The public and executive authorities are obliged to implement the decisions of the courts.

Public budgets at all levels are created by selling natural resources to individuals and legal entities, as well as from payments for polluting the environment.

All chatty pseudo-intellectuals believe that autocracies are transformed into republics as a result of the spread of the humane and wise ideas of «Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite» and the implementation of passionate popular revolutions.
In reality, this happens due to the fundamental inability of state information systems to effectively manage industrial economies.
Private businessmen invest their capital only under the condition of legal guarantees of the inviolability of private property and freedom of enterprise, which can be truly ensured only by republics.

Optimal social system

In the future Historical perspective, only societies that successfully develop in the coming and following decades will prosper.
The main factor and parameter of successful development of the country is the total national sum of private investments in production, infrastructure, construction, export income and public expenditure on science, education, birth and upbringing of children.
This is the criterion of the optimality of the structure and functioning of society, but not GDP and not the standard of living.

The optimal social system is the «Federal Communal Republic» (FCR) – world.kamerton.global/node/364

«The Federal Communal Republic» has the following main properties:
society consists of communities of different types and levels – from local to national;
communities are included in communities of higher levels and form a hierarchical structure;
a community that is part of another community transfers part of its management functions to it and implements the decisions of its governing bodies and the court in accordance with the unification agreement;
decision-making of communities of all types and levels is based on the universal corporate principle «The vote weight is equal to the contribution»;
community members can leave their composition in accordance with the agreements of associations.

Communities can include participants of different types – individuals and legal entities, municipal and territorial communities, business clubs and chambers of commerce and industry, consumer associations, religious communities, industry business associations, etc.

In the 19th-20th centuries, business elites exercised real political power under the decorative cover of pseudo-democratic procedures – world.kamerton.global/node/325
As a result, Western countries had the main properties inherent in FCR – world.kamerton.global/node/324
Therefore, such a regime of power caused sufficient efficiency and successful development of Western countries.

In the 1960-90s, the countries-“Asian Tigers” – Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Korea had properties that were close to the FCR properties.
These properties made them especially effective.
But in 1997, Hong Kong was annexed by China.
In the 2000s, under pressure from the West, Taiwan and Korea were forced to democratize their political systems, which worsened their effectiveness.
Singapore remains the only country whose properties are close to the FCR properties.
Some FCR properties have been created in modern China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Dubai.
These properties make these countries more effective.

At the beginning of the 21st century, Western business elites frivolously and recklessly abandoned the burden of their power and gave it to clans of politicians – world.kamerton.global/node/379
Thereby, they “cut off the branch” on which they had successfully existed, and which was the basis of the well-being of the entire Western civilization.
As a result of this political revolution, the power of party functionaries and bureaucrats was established, and the long-awaited, real Democracy came.
As a result, the effectiveness of Western societies has dramatically decreased.
Western civilization is degrading, collapsing, and dying out.

The effectiveness of democratic systems is significantly less than the effectiveness of republics and even autocracies.
Therefore, democracies lose the competition to autocracies.
Democracies are losing the ability to sell their products and buy natural resources on world markets.
Their defense capabilities have weakened up to losing protection from Russia and China threats, up to nuclear blackmail from the DPRK and Iran, and even to the blocking of international shipping by the Houthi tribes.
Tens of millions of wild migrants are filling Western countries, harassing their populations, and establishing their own traditions and ways of life.
These processes are getting worse with increasing speed.
Democracies have no factors capable of stopping their degradation and weakening and restoring their former effectiveness and development.

Systemic properties of democracy

The main institution of the Democratic system is political parties.
These parties have their own governing bodies.
One of their main functions is the co-optation of members into their party, political and state nomenclatures.
Thus, political functionaries are appointed to their posts by decisions of party governing bodies, but not local communities.
In particular, functionaries of local party bodies are appointed by decisions of higher party bodies, but not local organizations of party members.

Deputies of representative bodies of power formally represent the population of their territorial electoral districts.
The population of the district is a multitude of unrelated people who do not form effectively functioning communities and are easily subject to mass political manipulation.
Thus, deputies of democratic bodies are not delegated by real communities.
Therefore, unlike republics, these deputies are not delegates, but “cooptates” – co-optees.
Co-optees implement decisions not of local communities of citizens, but of the party organs that co-opted them.

The absence of delegation of political functionaries by communities slows down and minimizes the renewal of party governing organs.
The members of these organs naturally strive to maintain their pleasant posts by minimizing the co-optation of new functionaries.
Therefore, these organs consist mainly of old people with age-related dementia.

The co-optation of members of the ruling elites (aristocracies, juntas, nomenclatures) and their subordination to the decisions of higher governing organs are properties inherent in authoritarian systems, but not in republics.

Democratic authorities forcibly take away 30-70% and sometimes up to 90% of the property of citizens and enterprises in the form of taxes.
Democratic authorities forcibly compel citizens to fulfill prescribed duties – to serve in the army, sit on juries, participate in voting, report on income.
They force enterprises to produce certain products, hire workers, including top managers from certain social groups, and maintain costly accounting and reporting systems.

Democratic authorities create huge and expensive bureaucratic apparatuses.
These apparatuses inefficiently manage huge public resources.
They squander and plunder most of these resources.

Democratic authorities create huge and casuistic legislation and binding rules and regulations.
Because of this, legal systems are very expensive and ineffective.
In particular, ineffective, vicious patent systems cause enormous damage to economies.

The above properties are inherent in authoritarian systems, but not in republics.
Thus, democracy has systemic properties of authoritarianism.
These properties significantly reduce the effectiveness of democratic societies.

The lack of natural justifications, artificial utopianism and falsity of the ideology of democracy forced its propagandists to turn it into a quasi-religious cult.
The clerics of this cult – politicians, lawyers, professors, the press, bohemians claim that the foundations of democracy – “The Highest Values – the Rights and Freedoms of people” are established by God.
At the same time, most of these demo-clerics do not believe in God.

As a result of the social-liberal revolution in the 2000s, the cult of democracy has grown in the minds of many of its adherents to fanaticism.
Demo-fanatics attack people who do not support this cult and doubt the ideas of multigenderism, child free, feminism, etc., discriminate against them, deprive them of work, ostracize and subject them to violence.
Mass fanaticism of the cult of democracy is fascisation – a tendency to transform a democratic system into the highest form of authoritarianism – totalitarianism.

The communal nature of people

Evolution created altruism so that packs would help weakened individuals.
However, this mechanism acts relatively weakly.
The mechanisms of development of a biological Species act many times stronger than the interests of individuals and cause the primacy of the goals of the Species over the goals of individuals.

Therefore, the Law of Biological Evolution of Nature is:
"Each individual is destined to increase his pack.
Each pack is destined to multiply his population.
Each population is destined to spread his Species."

The interests and goals of an individual and a pack often oppose each other.
The interests and goals of a pack activate the genetic instinctive behavior programs of a normal healthy individual, which direct his actions to the benefit of the pack to the detriment of his personal interests and even life.
In competitive Evolution, those packs whose members sacrifice their interests for the goals of the packs survive.

Humanity, societies, and people are parts of Nature and are subject to its objective Laws.
Societies that observe these Laws prosper and develop.
Societies that oppose these Laws degrade and collapse.

Parts of people's actions and resources are directed in different ways to their families, communities and society.
The larger these parts, the better families, communities and society exist and develop, but individuals exist and develop worse and produce fewer actions and resources.
Reduction of the production of actions and resources of individuals reduces the well-being and development of families, communities and society.

On the other hand, a decrease in the parts of people's actions and resources directed to their families, communities and society improves the existence of individuals, but worsens the existence of families, communities and society.
The weakening of families, communities and society worsens the existence and development of individuals.
Thus, a certain value of the part of people's actions and resources directed to their families, communities and society optimizes the existence and development of families, communities and society.

A decrease or increase in this value relative to the optimum worsens the existence and development of families, communities and society.
In the competition of societies, those societies that establish optimal ratios of individual and public resources according to the criterion of maximizing the development of society win.
States that excessively oppress or excessively indulge their populations weaken and lose the international competition.

Utopian doctrine of individualism

Wikipedia reports that humans are primates of the Homo sapiens species of the Hominid family.
Biological Evolution created the psyche of primates with genetic, instinctive programs of pack behavior and ways of existence.
Therefore, humans are pack animals that live within complex social structures consisting of many groups of different sizes – from family to society.

For the doctrinal justification of Democracy, its ideologists came up with the utopian doctrine of Individualism – the supremacy of the Individual, “Divine Higher Values”, “the Rights and Freedoms of individuals”.
This doctrine has no objective natural scientific, psychological, sociological foundations.
The doctrine of Individualism obviously contradicts and directly counteracts the pack-social nature of the human psyche and the properties of social systems.

The postulate of the supremacy of “the Rights and Freedoms” of the Individual – “Divine Supreme Values” serves as the logical basis for the utopian doctrine of the “Supreme Power of the People”, in which the people are a multitude of individuals endowed with the right to participate in periodic elections of political functionaries.

This doctrine replaces the phenomenon of Society – a highly complex, hierarchical, stable, effective system of communities – with the phenomenon of the Nation – a primitive, large, ineffective multitude of independent individuals.

The collective consciousness of a poorly structured mass of independent individuals is easily subject to political manipulation.
This simplifies the management of the population, but facilitates the change of ruling parties – the subjects of this management and their ideologies.
This circumstance weakens stability and reduces the effectiveness of society.

One of the main, traditional methods of manipulating the population is the announcement of threats of attacks by real or imaginary enemies of the nation and a call to unite under the leadership of certain leaders and their parties to save the nation from these attacks. 
Western pseudo-democracies of the 20th century, actually controlled by national business elites, did not use this method and sought peace, trade and cooperation with neighboring countries. 
In real democracies of the 21st century, competing party clans of politicians are increasingly using this method and strengthening aggressive rhetoric in Western countries.

Systemic properties of ochlocracy

Deputies of democratic bodies are elected by the population of their districts from among candidates proposed by the governing bodies of political parties.
In order to increase their electorate and gain power, parties and politicians tempt the population with significant benefits from public resources.
Excessive indulgence of the poor weakens their incentive to work useful for families, communities and society.
The formation of public resources required to tempt the poor electorate causes excessive oppression of the prosperous classes of society.
This reduces their ability to develop resource production.
As a result, the resources of families, communities and society decrease.
They weaken their functioning and stop developing.

Representatives of several political parties compete in the election of deputies.
This competition forces them to promise and distribute the maximum amount of public resources to voters.
These handouts corrupt the population, which extorts more and more “bread and circuses” – benefits from the state.

Members of the poor classes commit the majority of crimes.
Ideologists and managers of political parties are afraid to irritate the numerous electorate of these classes.
Therefore, parties establish laws with humane and weak punishments for crimes.
Executive authorities use humane police methods of combating criminals.
Therefore, democratic countries have a high crime rate.

The properties described above are inherent in ochlocracies.

Chimera of autocracy and ochlocracy

Thus, democracy is a social system-“chimera”, which artificially combines the main properties of autocracy and ochlocracy.
This unnatural combination of vicious properties of qualitatively different social systems significantly reduces the efficiency of society, destroys the economy, and slows down development.
The quasi-religious cult of democracy prevents the scientific transformation of degrading, weakening, and dying democratic states into normal, effective federal communal republics – world.kamerton.global/node/364

E. Gershman

___